The Shortage Hits Hardest Where the Work Is Hardest
Not every job is equally hard to fill. The shortage concentrates in the skilled, repetitive, physically punishing tasks that keep parts moving — and finishing work sits at the center of that pain. Polishing, deburring, grinding, sanding, and surface preparation demand precision and consistency, yet they wear operators down shift after shift and take years to master. When a veteran finisher retires, the institutional knowledge of pressure, angle, and feel walks out the door, and it cannot be posted as a job opening and refilled in a month.
Nowhere is this more visible than in high-value components. Turbine blades and aerospace structural parts carry surface tolerances measured in microns, and a single inconsistent pass can scrap a part worth thousands of dollars. As demand surges, hand-finishing simply cannot scale — which is exactly why hot-section finishing has become one of the least-discussed chokepoints in the turbine supply crunch, a dynamic examined in Gas Turbine Lead Times Just Hit Five Years — and Hot-Section Finishing Is Part of the Bottleneck. The parts are growing more complex, the tolerances tighter, and the pool of people who can meet them by hand smaller every year. Wage competition compounds the problem: as shops bid against one another for the same scarce finishers, labor costs rise even when headcount does not.
Why Manufacturers Can’t Simply Hire Their Way Out
The instinctive response to a labor shortage is to recruit harder. The data suggests that strategy has already reached its limit. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, overall employment of machinists and tool and die makers is projected to decline about 2 percent through 2034 — yet the occupation still generates roughly 34,200 openings every year, all of them created by workers retiring or leaving the field rather than by growth. In plain terms, shops are running hard just to replace the people walking out the door, with no surplus left over to staff expansion.
The same BLS analysis is direct about what closes the gap: it credits automation — including CNC machine tools, autoloaders, and high-speed machining — with increasing the output of each remaining worker. That is the quiet pivot reshaping the industry. When you cannot add enough people, the only remaining lever is to produce more finished parts from the workforce you already have — and to redeploy your scarce skilled hands toward the judgment-intensive work that machines cannot do.
Automation as the Practical Lever
Robotic finishing and surface-prep cells answer the shortage in a way recruiting cannot. A programmed six-axis cell applies the same force, speed, and path on part ten thousand as on part one, eliminating the operator-to-operator and shift-to-shift variability that drives scrap and rework. It does not fatigue mid-shift, does not require a multi-year apprenticeship, and does not carry critical process knowledge out the door when it leaves. Just as importantly, it frees experienced people to focus on setup, inspection, and problem-solving instead of standing at a buffing wheel for eight hours.
That shift matters most in sectors where quality is non-negotiable. As aerospace ramps additive manufacturing into full production, the bottleneck has moved downstream to post-processing — the deburring, support removal, and surface finishing that every printed part still requires, a challenge broken down in Aerospace’s Additive Boom Has a Post-Processing Problem — Robots Are the Fix. And as reshoring pulls production back to North American plants faster than local talent pipelines can respond, manufacturers face mounting pressure to prove repeatable, documented quality to auditors and prime contractors alike — the focus of Reshoring Is Colliding With an AS9100 Quality Squeeze — Where Robotic Cleaning and Surface Prep Come In. In each case, automation is no longer a cost-cutting nicety. It is the mechanism that lets a plant hit its numbers at all.
What a Force Multiplier Looks Like in Practice
The strongest case for automation is not that it removes people — it is that it multiplies the people a plant already has. A small team can oversee multiple finishing cells, turning a role that used to occupy an entire crew into an oversight function. Scrap and rework fall because the process no longer depends on who is having a good day. Throughput rises on exactly the complex surface profiles that slow even the most experienced manual operators. And because the process is engineered and documented rather than held in one person’s hands, a retirement or resignation no longer threatens a production line. For a manufacturer trying to convert a record backlog into delivered parts, those gains land directly on the bottom line.
From Optional to Essential
The framing has flipped. For most of the past two decades, robotic finishing was pitched as an efficiency upgrade — a way to trim labor costs when the business case penciled out. In 2026, with backlogs at record highs and the workforce contracting, it has become something closer to essential infrastructure. Manufacturers that engineer consistency into their finishing and surface processes can absorb demand, protect margins, and keep delivery commitments. Those that remain dependent on an ever-scarcer pool of manual finishers will keep turning away profitable work they cannot staff. The labor math is not going to reverse this decade — which is why the manufacturers moving now are treating automation not as a someday project, but as the way they intend to compete.
Forged Path Automation: Engineering Consistency Into Finishing
Forged Path Automation designs, builds, programs, and supports complete robotic finishing and material-removal systems for aerospace, turbine, MRO, and industrial manufacturers. Founder-led and based in the Southeast, FPA owns every phase — from process analysis through installation, operator training, and long-term support — so your finishing process becomes engineered and repeatable rather than dependent on who shows up for the shift.
Our Services Include:
- Robotic Finishing Automation — Programmable cells for polishing, buffing, deburring, and sanding that deliver consistent surface quality across every part and every shift.
- Process Engineering and System Design — Feasibility analysis, cycle-time optimization, and automation strategy built around your real production requirements from the start.
Ready to Transform Your Operations? Contact Forged Path Automation to discuss how robotic finishing automation can help your team meet demand without adding headcount.
About the Author
Chris Urban is the Founder of Forged Path Automation. His 26+ year manufacturing career spans from an international manufacturing specialist trained in Zurich, Switzerland, to corporate President and business owner. Before launching Forged Path Automation (FPA), Chris scaled an industrial gas turbine business unit from its infancy to $50M in value, directed the zero-downtime relocation of 100+ industrial machines to a 150,000 sq. ft. Center of Excellence, and led US operations for a $2.3B global firm. Today, Chris leverages his deep technical roots and an MBA to engineer turnkey robotic finishing cells that deliver total production stability and clear ROI for high-mix manufacturers. Chris holds an advanced background in both the technical and financial sides of manufacturing, combining studies in Applied Science with a Master of Business Administration.
Connect with Chris on LinkedIn to talk shop or discuss your floor’s ROI.
Follow Forged Path Automation on LinkedIn or visit ForgedPathAutomation.com.. Create blog 2
Works Cited
“Aerospace Supply Chain Bottlenecks Continue to Constrain Airlines.” International Air Transport Association, 9 Dec. 2025, www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2025-releases/2025-12-09-02/. Accessed 13 July 2026.
Clark, Kevin. “Gas Turbine Prices Climb 195% as Supply Crunch Reshapes Power Development.” Power Engineering, 1 Apr. 2026, www.power-eng.com/gas/turbines/gas-turbine-prices-climb-195-as-supply-crunch-reshapes-power-development/. Accessed 13 July 2026.
“Machinists and Tool and Die Makers.” Occupational Outlook Handbook, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, www.bls.gov/ooh/production/machinists-and-tool-and-die-makers.htm. Accessed 13 July 2026.
“Manufacturers Need as Many as 3.8 Million New Employees by 2033.” The Manufacturing Institute, 2024, themanufacturinginstitute.org/manufacturers-need-as-many-as-3-8-million-new-employees-by-2033/. Accessed 13 July 2026.
Related Articles